2385

Get a Live Demo

You need to see DPS gear in action. Get a live demo with our engineers.

White Paper Series

Check out our White Paper Series!

A complete library of helpful advice and survival guides for every aspect of system monitoring and control.

DPS is here to help.

1-800-693-0351

Have a specific question? Ask our team of expert engineers and get a specific answer!

Learn the Easy Way

Sign up for the next DPS Factory Training!

DPS Factory Training

Whether you're new to our equipment or you've used it for years, DPS factory training is the best way to get more from your monitoring.

Reserve Your Seat Today

Scalable Monitoring Solutions to Future-Proof Water Management Facilities

By Andrew Erickson

September 20, 2024

Share: 

Water management facilities face challenges (some unique, some universal) when it comes to monitoring their systems effectively. With equipment spread out across multiple locations, the need for real-time visibility and reliable alarms is constant. But as facilities grow and equipment needs change, many managers find their existing monitoring solutions are not flexible enough to handle new requirements.

A lack of flexibility can lead to frustration and inefficiency. When managing a network of devices with outdated or inadequate tools, delays, missed alarms, and system downtime often occur. Without a monitoring system that can adapt and grow, water management facilities are stuck with a patchwork solution that struggles to meet the needs of an expanding network.

Together, we'll now go over different ways to address the challenges of growing systems for water management sites - in order to prevent serious consequences.

Water treatment facility

Basic Monitoring Systems Can't Easily Handle Multiple Simultaneous Alarms

A common trend we see at water treatment facilities is having a basic monitoring setup, which works fine for a limited number of devices or alarms. But as the facility expands (whether by adding new equipment, expanding operations, or adhering to updated regulatory requirements) your system quickly becomes overwhelmed.

The monitoring solution that once seemed adequate is now a bottleneck. It's simply unable to scale with the growing number of sensors and devices that need to be monitored.

Basic Systems Have Limited Capacity

One of the major issues with these outdated or rigid systems is their limited input capacity. For example, a system may only support a small number of alarms. This leaves new equipment unmonitored or forcing operators to rely on manual processes. This lack of scalability leads to inefficiencies, as personnel spend valuable time gathering data from spread out sources.

In emergency situations, sifting through disorganized data can lead to delayed responses. Operators must wrangle multiple systems to identify the root cause of a problem. It doesn't help that older systems often lack the ability to monitor environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, which are critical for maintaining the operational integrity of remote equipment.

Basic Systems Have Difficulty Integrating with Other Devices

Another significant pain point is the inability to integrate legacy equipment with new monitoring tools. Many water management facilities still rely on older systems that, while functional, do not support modern protocols or interfaces. This makes it difficult to create a unified monitoring solution, forcing operators to juggle multiple platforms and systems.

As more equipment is added, the situation becomes even more complicated, increasing the likelihood of errors and missed alarms.

Without a centralized monitoring solution, facility managers must use multiple disconnected systems. This can create disorganization, leading to confusion, missed alarms, and delayed maintenance. In the worst case, critical issues like pump failures or power outages might go unnoticed until it's too late to prevent significant damage or service disruptions.

Patchwork Solutions Fail to Solve Monitoring Problems

Once water treatment facility managers recognize the limitations of their current monitoring systems, they often seek out quick fixes. One common attempt to solve the problem is by adding standalone monitoring devices to track new equipment. At first glance, this might seem like a practical solution, but it often leads to further issues.

Rather than solving the problem of scalability, adding standalone devices creates a patchwork of disconnected devices that don't communicate with one another.

As a result, operators are left trying to manually coordinate data from several systems. That adds even more complexity and increases the risk of missing critical alarms.

Entire System Upgrades Are Costly - and Not Always Scalable

Another approach is to upgrade entire monitoring systems all at once, replacing everything with new equipment. While this may work for some, it is rarely feasible for most water management facilities. The cost of replacing perfectly functional equipment is high, and such an overhaul can take significant time and resources to implement.

This approach also doesn't address the need for long-term scalability. Even after a full system replacement, you may find yourself facing the same issue a few years down the road as you expand further.

Some facility managers also turn to off-the-shelf monitoring systems, believing these systems will offer the scalability they need. However, these generic solutions often lack the flexibility to accommodate the specific requirements of a water management facility. Off-the-shelf systems may not support the unique protocols or devices that the facility uses, forcing managers to make compromises in functionality. In many cases, these systems also lack the ability to integrate legacy equipment. That give you the same disorganized, multi-system setup that caused issues in the first place.

These shortcomings inevitably lead facility managers to seek help from more specialized vendors who can offer custom solutions tailored to their exact needs.

Your System Should Be Organized and Expandable

For a water treatment facility, the best monitoring solution is flexible, scalable, and able to work with both old and new equipment. A modular design is important because it lets you begin with a basic setup and expand gradually as your facility grows or new regulations come into play.

Instead of replacing the whole system when adding new equipment, a modular system makes it easy to add new devices like sensors, alarms, and control units.

A Centralized Master Allows for One Pane of Glass

Your remote monitoring system should also include a centralized station that can consolidate all the data in one location. This "single pane of glass" setup makes sure that all alarms and status updates are visible in one easy-to-use interface.

Centralized monitoring helps you stay organized and respond faster to issues, rather than having to track alarms across multiple systems.

Your System Should Support Several Protocols

Flexibility in protocol support is another critical feature. The system should be able to communicate with both older, legacy devices and newer equipment. This means you can support a wide range of protocols, such as SNMPv1, v2, and v3, as well as other common interfaces. With this flexibility, facilities can continue to use their existing equipment without being forced into costly upgrades.

Provide Visibility and Track Environmental Conditions

It's important that your system provides visibility into environmental factors like temperature and humidity. These variables are essential for keeping remote equipment operational. Your system should also offer control capabilities, allowing operators to not only monitor but also manage equipment remotely. For example, a facility manager should be able to reset devices, control power, and adjust settings without needing to physically visit the site. The system should also be built to handle the environmental extremes that water management facilities often face, from high temperatures to humidity.

Finally, the ideal system should be secure, offering encrypted communication protocols to protect sensitive data. With security threats constantly evolving, water management facilities must have a system in place that protects their operations from unauthorized access and potential breaches.

The Right Devices Centralize Alarms and Offer Scalability

DPS Telecom offers solutions that align with the needs of water treatment facilities. The T/Mon LNX master station is an example of a product designed for centralized monitoring. It consolidates data from all monitoring devices into one location, giving facility managers that sought-after "single pane of glass" for easy and efficient network management​.

It doesn't matter whether you're managing alarms from a legacy device or a modern sensor. The T/Mon can handle your monitoring needs as the device supports multiple protocols. This eliminates the need to replace functioning older equipment, helping facilities avoid unnecessary expenses.

Another popular product, the NetGuardian RTU, offers modular scalability. These remote telemetry units (RTUs) can be configured to monitor a wide range of inputs - from discrete alarms to analog signals like temperature and humidity.

As your facility grows, the NetGuardian can grow with you, allowing you to easily add more inputs without needing to overhaul the entire system​​. With built-in SNMPv3 support, it also addresses the need for secure communication, keeping your network safe from unauthorized access.

DPS products are built to operate in the toughest conditions, making them ideal for water treatment facilities where extreme temperatures and humidity are common. The NetGuardian 864A, for instance, is designed to function in temperatures ranging from -22 degrees F to 158 degrees F. Having a device that can operate in extreme conditions ensures your equipment remains operational even in harsh environments​.

Ultimately, DPS systems are designed with control in mind. With remote control capabilities, facility managers can manage devices from anywhere, reducing the need for costly on-site visits. Whether you need to reset a device or adjust power settings, DPS solutions give you the control you need - without the hassle of traveling to your remote locations.

Enhance Your Network Monitoring Today

If your water management facility is struggling with an outdated or rigid monitoring system, it's time to consider a more scalable and flexible solution. DPS Telecom offers industry-leading products that allow your monitoring system to grow with your facility while keeping all your critical alarms and data centralized. Don't let ineffective systems hold you back.

Contact DPS Telecom today at 1-800-693-0351 or email sales@dpstele.com to learn how our solutions can help you streamline your monitoring operations. We'll work with you to create a system that fits your specific needs and scales with your future growth.

Share: 
Andrew Erickson

Andrew Erickson

Andrew Erickson is an Application Engineer at DPS Telecom, a manufacturer of semi-custom remote alarm monitoring systems based in Fresno, California. Andrew brings more than 17 years of experience building site monitoring solutions, developing intuitive user interfaces and documentation, and opt...